Alternatives to Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

These models are alternatives by measurable coding evidence: they share the current open/open-weight classificationand are closest to Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct's SWE-bench score. Similarity here does not mean identical capabilities, licence terms, or output quality.

The target model

SWE-bench
73.5%
Cheapest input
$0.25
Cheapest output
$0.75
Hosts
5
AlternativeSWE-benchInput $/MTokOutput $/MTokHostsContextTradeoff
Kimi K2.573.8%$0.40$1.9030262khigher input price
Kimi K2.676.7%$0.55$2.5248256khigher input price
Qwen3.6 Max Preview76.7%$1.03$6.162262khigher input price
Qwen3.6 27B70.0%$0.29$2.0021262khigher input price
Qwen3.7 Max77.3%$1.48$4.4221.0Mhigher input price
DeepSeek V4 Pro 042377.6%$0.79$1.74411.0Mhigher input price
Nemotron 3 Ultra69.0%$0.50$2.2010262khigher input price
Kimi K2.7 Code78.2%$0.67$3.4035262khigher input price
Devstral 2 251262.8%$0.44$2.202262khigher input price
Qwen3.8 Max85.6%$2.00$6.0021.0Mhigher coding score, higher input price
Qwen3.8 27B86.0%$0.35$2.5520262khigher coding score, higher input price
Kimi K2 071160.2%$0.57$2.303131khigher input price

How alternatives are selected

Alternatives must have a benchmark score and the same current open/closed classification as the target. They are sorted by score distance, then by price/performance. The table compares hosted API economics; it does not establish licence compatibility or self-hosting rights.

Check the model licence, provider Terms, context limits, tool support, and output quality before switching a production workload.